Index

Showing posts with label Adam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam. Show all posts

Monday, February 6, 2017

Brainiacks Dispute the Bible

Isn’t it so encouraging when we read of so-called Bible “experts” that call Jesus a liar? (Yes, I am being both sarcastic and facetious.) Yet, that is exactly what this article is doing. How are they calling Jesus a liar? Matthew 19:4 quotes Jesus as saying: “Have you not read that the one who created them from the beginning made them male and female.”

Was Jesus merely stating the obvious – that we humans are male and female, but not that Adam and Eve where two literal people? No. We know this because of the matter of “sin” and the reason for the ransom. Romans 5:12 states: That is why, just as through one man sin entered into the world and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because they had all sinned.” (Other versions) Think about that for a moment. If, as these super-knowledgeable men quoted in the article claim (who surely must have been there at Creation in order to so blatantly dispute the Bible’s own words), that it was not one couple but a community, then how could all the “population of humans” all commit the same sin so that we all ended up imperfect today? Surely some of the “population of humans” wouldn’t have been guilty so that their progeny would not have inherited sin. Oh wait, I think I know. It must have been intermarriage that caused the contamination, right? LOL

Yet some more fake brain-iacks with unscriptural, and indeed anti-scriptural, teachings that fall apart when given serious consideration.




Thursday, November 13, 2014

Adam and Eve: Justifiable Disobedience?

A young man about 12 years old really impressed me with a question that had him baffled. It demonstrated what a deep thinker he is. He asked, "If Adam and Eve were perfect, wouldn't their perfect sense of justice prevent them from disobeying their Creator?"

Going to the source material is always the best solution in these matters . Genesis 3:4-5 explains why justice got skewed in Eve's mind. She was told by “the serpent” that God had been unjust by preventing her from reaching her full potential. The serpent (a guise of Satan) had Eve so cunningly and thoroughly deceived that she may have even thought to herself that even if she asked God whether the charges are true or not, she wouldn't be able to trust the answer. In her mind, God's truthfulness and justice were in question. Therefore, being disloyal to a God that wasn't truthful to her was no longer an issue. In other words, since God was unjust in preventing her from achieving her potential, then she didn't feel she owed justice and loyalty to God.

Compounding the issue, after Eve ate the fruit she didn’t die on the spot, so when she gave it Adam, she may have said (although there is no record of it in scripture), “Hey, I ate it and I’m still alive.” Sadly, she was blatantly lied to by Satan and then she allowed personal (selfish) desire to enter the picture.After their eviction from paradise, they were treated just as a parent who rejects a wayward child, “You are dead to me.” Indeed, Jehovah God treated them both as dead, never again speaking to Adam like he did in the garden.

In reality, there were things Eve could have done to verify any doubt she had. But the account is quite plain as to what the real reason was for her disobedience: Eve “saw that the tree was good for food and that it was something desirable to the eyes, yes, the tree was pleasing to look at. So she began taking of its fruit and eating it.” (Genesis 3:6)

Sunday, March 31, 2013

Perfection And Creation

Index of Blog Articles


When I first started to consider this question, I thought to myself: “Oh, this is an easy-to-answer question--a couple scriptures and boom, it’s done.” Then I started to consider all the nuances that this issue has taken on in the form of honest questions. Here are two of them:


  • If Adam was perfect, how could he sin? (The assumption here is that “perfect” implies that such a person would be incapable of doing wrong.)
  • Since the scriptures teach that everything God does is perfect, why then do we accept the death of animals as normal but view death of humans as abnormal? (There are at least two things I can think of that need to be addressed here: 1) Does being perfect imply eternal existence? 2) Does God’s intentions and promises toward us differ from other life forms?)
For this first installment, I am going to start with the definition of perfect as used not only in Scripture, but also in common daily speech. Dictionary.com offers five definitions for the word. Given the context of any particular verse, most of those would fit one or more ways that Scripture uses the term. The following short list of synonyms links to specific verses that use the word perfect: flawless, indiscriminate, impeccable, fully capable, complete, matchless & uncompromised, without obstacles, able to get at the heart of matters.

For the most part, the concise definition I’ve settled on is that "perfect" means that which is completely suited for the intended purpose. One point that seems to be missed by some I speak with is that there is room for planned obsolescence within the definition of what “perfect” is. In the linked article, it states that manufacturers can and do actually design products to have a specific “life-duration.” We may not like it, but it is there. So, if your cell phone lasts around four years, as far as the industry is concerned, it outlived it’s life. (I participate in one online forum regarding cellphones and read several online industry website articles about the technology. Based on the numbers, it seems most people keep a particular make/model of phone for an average of 18 to 24 months. The market-life is even shorter. 2nd reference.)

So those that argue that “perfect” does not necessarily mean everlasting--you are right. But that is not all there is to the subject when considering what God’s Word, The Bible, says about humans. If you are interested, continue reading Parts 2 & 3.


Part 2: If Adam Was Perfect, How Could He Sin?
Part 3: Was Adam Perfect and Does That Mean He Would Have Lived Forever?


Index of Blog Articles

If Adam Was Perfect, How Could He Sin?

Index of Blog Articles

Part 1: Perfection And Creation. How Does the Bible Use The Word "Perfect"?
Part 3: Was Adam Perfect and Does That Mean He Would Have Lived Forever?

(This is Part 2)
Most parents, even today, would not intentionally raise their children to hate them. Most parents want to see their children succeed. A recent article I read asked the question, “Given the choice, would you raise your children to be exact replicas of you, to be totally opposite of you, or would you want to raise them to blossom into responsible adults, nurturing their individual talents, able to express their individuality and make wise decisions?” Most parents would agree that we don’t want our children to be automatons, then again a loving parent would not want to raise a child that grows up hating them. The best we can try for, is to give them solid moral, emotional and practical training. Hopefully, if they are appreciative, they will likewise grow into responsible adults.

In like manner, God also does not want automatons of his human creation. Thus He gave us the ability to reason, to have a sense of right and wrong (conscience), to appreciate loyalty, love and honesty. He also gave us the choice to decide for ourselves what we would do with these powers and freedoms. That is the essence of free will. In Adam’s case, he was given the opportunity to demonstrate appreciation by following the simple directions given him: 1) cultivate the ground, 2) have oversight of the animals, 3) reproduce, and 4) of all the fruit-bearing vegetation available to him, he could eat it all except the fruit of one specific tree. This last directive allowed God to see how much appreciation Adam had for his Father’s authority to set limits. Would Adam be willing to leave that one tree alone, no matter how appealing it may look; no matter how sweet it may smell? It was not a hard test, it was not a confusingly difficult test. It definitely was not overly restrictive--it was just one tree out of many others. It was simple and straightforward.

I gained an appreciation of this simple test early in my life. At the time I was living with my aunt and uncle. It was a temporary solution while mom’s health improved. My uncle had a fruit tree in the back yard that was his favorite fruit. The yield was very small so he “commanded” us (me and my cousins) that we were not to even touch the fruit. Well, needless to say, I did and was punished. But the hardest thing to face was my uncle’s disappointment. Yes, he was upset at my blatant disobedience, but more than that, he was hurt by my lack of love. Here he had taken me in, housed me, fed me, clothed me. He thought I loved him. I did, but apparently not enough to respect his wishes.

Likewise, Adam showed great disrespect for his Creator. One simple restriction, and he wouldn't obey it. The difference with Adam was that he wasn't plagued with the moral imperfections, the tendency toward wrongdoing that we are today. In that God had already warned him that disobedience would result in death, that warning demonstrates that, as far as God was concerned, Adam was fully capable of being obedient. As in our definition of “perfect” in the first installment, Adam was made completely capable of carrying out everything God told him to do. Adam chose disobedience, not because he was somehow deficient morally or mentally (thus imperfect), but because of misusing his free will to make a selfish choice. (Again, reflect on Deuteronomy 32:4, which, in part, states God is not unjust. For those that want to believe Adam was made imperfect, they would also have to believe that, contrary to this scripture, God is unjust--because if Adam were somehow defective or deficient then the death penalty would have been unfair. From what I've learned and experienced in my life, I am 100% confident that God is just & more merciful than we deserve.)

Again, the matter over which Adam was to demonstrate his obedience was not rocket science, it was a simple test. Just as we raise our children to hopefully become responsible, well-adjusted and loving adults, God gave Adam all the right circumstances, all the right instruction and the best of conditions. But just as even rich kids born with the proverbial “silver spoons” in their mouths can turn out to be rotten, just so Adam chose to intentionally reject that one restriction. Being perfect does not preclude the ability to consider and act on a wrong choice. (I did not include Eve’s role in this because the focus is addressing Adam’s actions--would he listen to his Father’s voice and live, or would he listen to his wife’s voice and disobey?)

But what about Adam dying regardless of whether he proved loyal or not? I’ll address that question in part 3 this article.

Index of Blog Articles

Was Adam Perfect and Does That Mean He Would Have Lived Forever?



Part 1: Perfection And Creation. How Does the Bible Use The Word "Perfect"?
Part2: If Adam Was Perfect, How Could He Sin?

(This is Part 3)
In the first part of this article, I stated that one question I've come across is: Since the scriptures teach that everything God does is perfect, then why do we accept the death of animals as normal but death of humans as abnormal?  I mentioned that there are at least two things I can think of that need to be addressed here: 1) Does being perfect imply eternal existence? 2)  Does God’s intentions and promises toward us differ from other living life forms? I also stated that perfection does not necessarily mean something or someone lasts forever. It lasts for the duration of the intended use.

There is no record in scripture that animals sinned against God, so their dying cannot be attributed to that. Nor is there any promise from God that animals could have the potential of living forever. We accept animals die as part of planned obsolescence. (Animal lovers, please take note. I intend no cruel coldness here. At present, I have four animals, two dogs and two cats. I’ve trained them all live in harmony as a united pack and they all play and sleep together. In the past several years, as our animals aged, both my wife and I have shed heartfelt tears over having to put down sick and elderly pets. At present, two of our four animals have grown old and we know we’ll be faced with losing them.)

But the question is did God intend for us to become obsolete? In the most simplest and straightforward terms, the Bible itself answers that question by stating that Jesus came to undo what Adam had done and reverse what Adam had lost, and thus give us everlasting life. God’s Word plainly calls death “the last enemy” and that it will be eliminated. In the last book of the Bible, Revelation, we read thatdeath will be no more.” This will mean “life everlasting” for us. So if Jesus had to undo what Adam lost, it must have been that Adam lost more than God’s approval--he lost everlasting life for all his descendants. In short then, God did not originally design obsolescence into us. Just as his spirit creatures (the angels) have never died, he also intended for his fleshly intelligent creatures (that were the only ones on earth referred to as being made in God’s image) to also live forever.