Thursday, May 16, 2013

Why Be Happy?



At 1 Timothy 1:11, Paul mentions that the good news he was entrusted with is from the “happy God.” It occurred to me: Since God is happy, who am I to be any less. If my disposition is somber or rigid or gruff, does that convince others that I believe I serve the happy God? If my attitude and disposition reflect constant negativity, is that dignifying and extolling the happy God I worship? Does my dealings with others make them feel comforted or condemned; delighted or discouraged; endeared or estranged?

Really, when Jehovah inspired Paul to write “Be aglow with the spirit. ... Rejoice in the hope,” what makes my personal situation so important that I allow negativity to overshadows me? (Romans 12:11,12) Is that really the way I want to be known? Or, do I want to be known as a happy, encouraging, forgiving and supportive friend?

Ok, so you’ve had family and friends turn against you--so what!? You feel misunderstood, so what!? Jehovah had many, many angels turn against him, slander him and try to impede his purposes. And as far as things not turning out the way I wanted, once again, think of Jehovah--Instead of the earth being filled with a harmonious family, currently those worshiping him are a small minority. The vast majority either do not know Him or refuse to serve him. Instead of the earth being a gem of a paradise, mankind has filled it with all sorts of pollution  Yet none of that makes Jehovah bitter, negative, or sullen. He is “the happy God!” In time, he will correct not all all the things that sadden him, but he will also “wipe every tear from YOUR eyes.” (Rev.21:4)

So what do you do in the meantime? “Always rejoice in the Lord. Once more I will say, Rejoice!”  - Philippians 4:4

How Is Jesus the "Bread From Heaven"?



In the gospel of John, chapter 6, Jesus spoke of himself as the bread from heaven. A while back I wrote an article specifically addressing how Jesus’ words have been misinterpreted to promote an odd form of cannibalism. Recently I was remembering yet another passage, this time in the gospel of Matthew, that would aid those who believe God and his son (Jesus) are reasonable and intelligent beings but use illustrations to see if we reason, draw conclusions, and act intelligently.

At Matthew 16:11,12 we read: “How is it you do not discern that I did not talk to you about loaves? But watch out for the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” Then they grasped that he said to watch out, not for the leaven of the loaves, but for the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” In this illustration, Jesus draws a comparison between the teaching of the religious leaders and leaven. That is, the fermenting (corrupting) influence of their teachings. From this, reasonable and reasoning people should be able to conclude, without a lot of mental labor, that when Jesus spoke of himself as the bread from heaven, he meant that his teachings were really “the truth,” the real teachings of and from the Father.

How can teachings be compared to food and water? Jesus himself spoke of doing his Father’s work as nourishment for him. It gave Jesus such satisfaction to help others that he personally felt invigorated just as if he had eating a meal or drank refreshing water. Those that really study, apply and share what they know of scripture can likewise enjoy this satisfying feeling of having worked hard to serve God faithfully.

Friday, May 3, 2013

Prayer – Jesus Provides A “How To”


What’s In?
Sincerity
Respect
Our own words

What’s Out?
Formalism
Pompous showiness
Prepared Repetitive prayers and chants

Someone I know mentioned how comforting they found prayer. Someone else I know mentioned they only pray when they are having difficult times. Indeed, what we say to our heavenly Father, our Creator should be heart-felt (as in trialsome times) but there is so much to be gained by praying every day. In fact, the apostle Paul, one of the most prolific writers in the Greek scriptures (aka “New Testament”), encouraged all to pray without letup!

But when times are good, what do we pray about? Some are at a loss for words. Some think that prayer is always “asking” for something. But prayer can be so much more—such as saying “thank you” to God, or prayers about other people. Reviewing your day with “our heavenly Father” helps to open up our hearts to him. Jesus, at Matthew 6:9-15 provided what some have called “the model prayer.” A close examination of that helps us to make sure that we keep our priorities straight when talking to God.

God’s Interests: First, Christ said we should pray that God’s name be kept holy, sanctified, “hallowed.” Essentially, we are asking God that nothing we do or say detracts from who he is. Especially, just as a child would not want to do anything that would dirty the family name, we do not want to say or act in a way that brings discredit to our God. But Jesus was not only talking about reputation when he used the word “name” here. He was talking about the actual name. Again, when a family name gets sullied, it is directly tied to the actual name. “Did you hear what that Smith boy did?!” That family’s actual name gets spread around the community to the embarrassment of the whole family. Likewise, in order to esteem the “name” of God, we have to know it, acknowledge it, and use it. Since Jesus is the one that taught us to pray to the Father, he obviously was not referring to himself. And what is the name of the Father? You will find it the Hebrew writing about 7,000 times. You will find it on buildings that can still be seen in Europe. That name, in its Anglicized form is “Jehovah.”

Besides esteeming the name of God, the next thing on the list that Jesus provided also had to do with an interest of God—God’s Kingdom especially as it relates to it directly controlling and permeating the earth “just as it is in heaven.” We need to both pray for and work toward that cause. On a personal level, by learning what God wants from us and acting accordingly. On a grander level, following the assignment provided to all those claiming to follow Christ. (As a side note, ask yourself: “If Jesus told me to pray that God’s Kingdom would be completely active here on earth ‘just as’ it is in heaven, can I imagine how beautiful the earth will be at that time?”)

Our Physical Needs: Now that we’ve considered the most two most important things on God’s mind, now we can pray about our needs. And so, in verses 11-13, Jesus addresses those. First he says, “give us our bread for this day.” Note that he didn’t say we should pray for the food we need tomorrow, this week, or this month. He said, “today.” In fact, later in that same discourse, Jesus enlarged on this particular point. He advised us not to worry even about “tomorrow” and said that each current day is plenty for us to be concerned over. In fact, he concludes this “sermon on the mount” by once again urging us to keep the Kingdom foremost in our minds, hearts, prayers, and activity.

Forgiveness: So now that we can be confident about receiving on daily needs, the next thing Jesus mentions is for us to humbly acknowledge that we need forgiveness. But he tells us that forgiveness comes with a requirement—that we forgive others. In fact, the actual phrase used was to forgive us “just as” we forgive others. If we don’t forgive others, we shouldn’t expect forgiveness from God. See also Matthew 18:23-35.

Temptation: The final thing mentioned in the model prayer provided by Jesus was that we pray for protection and deliverance from “the wicked one,” Satan the devil. (New Living Translation of 2 Corinthians 4:4, Good News Version) In view of the quote from 2 Corinthians 4:4, it is evident that Satan’s attack is more than physical. It is mental and psychological. He blinds potential believers through deceptive tricks. Satan also exploits our own selfish desires. No wonder we need to pray for protection and then work earnestly to ensure our words and actions do not give Satan an open door to our minds and hearts.

With that, Jesus concludes this short but instructive sample prayer. So definitely pour out your hearts but keep in mind Jesus’ outline. There is much more that is said on the subject in the Bible—perhaps something to consider in another post.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

John 1 And The Trinity Teaching



This is a departure from my usual commentary/narrative style. This purpose of this post is to capture some snippets found on the web regarding the trinity teaching, John 1:1, and research done by some whose knowledge of Greek is admittedly much deeper than mine.


http://jehovah.to/xlation/ma.html (This article provides a rebuttal to Julius Mantey's arguments regarding the New World Translation's rendering of "a god" at John 1:1c.)

http://jehovah.to/exe/translation/coptic.pdf (This article shows how Coptic Greek is very specific in separating God and the Word. Note: In this PDF, there is a link that is either no longer a live website (http://copticjohn.com/) or is a typo.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_1:1  This article on wikipedia demonstrates that Jehovah's Witnesses are NOT the only ones choosing a rendering that disagrees with the mainstream teaching that Jesus is God. It compares 19 translations of John 1:1c, showing which chose to go with "the Word was God" and which chose a rendering that doesn't make Jesus out to be God Himself. 

Two of the more interesting quotes from the Wikipedia article are:
“[It] is clear that in the translation “the Word was God,” the term God is being used to denote his nature or essence, and not his person. But in normal English usage “God” is a proper noun, referring to the person of the Father or corporately to the three persons of the Godhead. Moreover, “the Word was God” suggests that “the Word” and “God” are convertible terms, that the proposition is reciprocating. But the Word is neither the Father nor the Trinity… The rendering cannot stand without explanation.”[4]Translations by James MoffattHugh J. Schonfield and Edgar Goodspeed render part of the verse as "...and the Word was divine."
An Orthodox Bible Commentary notes: "This second theos could also be translated ‘divine’ as the construction indicates "a qualitative sense for theos". The Word is not God in the sense that he is the same person as the theos mentioned in 1:1a; he is not God the Father (God absolutely as in common NT usage) or the Trinity. The point being made is that the Logos is of the same uncreated nature or essence as God the Father, with whom he eternally exists. This verse is echoed in the Nicene Creed: 'God (qualitative or derivative) from God (personal, the Father), Light from Light, True God from True God… homoousion with the Father.'"[5]

Additional Notes From The Gospel of John
At John 20:17, Jesus had just been resurrected. Mary Magdalene, thinking Jesus was a gardener, pleads with him to tell her where he has taken Jesus' body. With just a single word from Jesus, she immediately realizes who he is and apparently throws herself on him, clinging to him. Jesus' response is undeniable--he has yet to ascend to his Father, his God. Now, we are talking about the resurrected Jesus, so if he were God, this would have been the time to say so. Here is the word-for-word Greek-to-English rendering.

At John 20:31, John tells his readers why he recounted all the things Jesus did. Was it so that his readers would believe that Jesus was God or that Jesus was the Son of God? He pointedly indicates that it was that Jesus was the (preeminent) Son of God.

I wanted to keep this post only about the gospel of John because that is the main focus of those who believe in the trinity. However, one key scripture that no trinitarian has ever been able to answer is recorded at 1 Corinthians 15:28. In this verse (context here), Paul is talking about after the millennial reign of Christ is over. So he is in heaven and been ruling for some time. Paul plainly writes that Christ turns over the kingdom to God for the purpose of God being all things to all people? How could Jesus "hand over" the kingdom to God and make himself subject to God if Jesus himself is God? How would you answer it?

Monday, April 29, 2013

Does God Test Us?


Do you remember the first time your parents trusted you to be left home alone? I can’t say that I remember the exact incident but I do remember thinking to myself, “Wow, this is weird. I’ve never been left alone before.” Like most parents, they gave me the typical warnings, “Don’t do anything you know we wouldn’t permit, OR ELSE!” Every child knows exactly what the “or else” means, it means punishment of some sort or another. What is at stake here is our parent’s ability to trust us. Leaving us alone for the first time was a test of that trust. It is also a test of how much we love our parents.

Do parents have the right to impose such tests on their children? Being left alone is all part of the social growing process—learning responsibility and accountability. Really, if the child never learns those he (or she) becomes a burden to society. So yes, a parent needs to train their child to act responsibly. What then about God training mankind? His tests on us are pretty much the same—tests of trust, loyalty and love.

The very first test recorded in the Bible was one of trust. Jehovah told the first human pair not to eat from just one tree. If we parents need to train our children how to act responsibly, it certainly is not wrong for God to train mankind using the same simple and straightforward lesson. Another such lesson of loyalty and obedience is recorded at Exodus 16:4. The “test” was whether or not the masses would trust in God enough to not hoard the manna and to not go looking for it on the seventh day. Both in this case and in the case of Adam and Eve, God generously provided and all he wanted in return was trust and obedience. In researching the word “test” as used in the Bible and in reference to what God does toward mankind, this was the only type of test God imposed on us—he blesses us richly and then asks back proof that we love and willingly, uncompromisingly trust and obey him. (See the additional references below.)

There is another type of test we face, but it is not something God brings on us. It is a test of our character that Satan and this godless world we live in put on us. Returning to the parent/child illustration, consider the situation when the child gets old enough to start socializing outside the family circle with minimal (maybe no) adult supervision. The parents’ hope is that the training they gave their child is enough to help him or her make wise decisions. So say the child goes to a party with his peers and finds liquor and other recreational drugs being used. Now, the parent didn’t put that test on their child—the situation and peer pressure did. This type of test is one that a parent would rather spare their child from, but they know that eventually they will need to trust that the child has to start being self-accountable. This is in essence the test that Job underwent—would he keep loyal to God or would he get angry and blame God. In fact, at one point his wife told him to blame (curse) God and die. Likewise, even Jesus went through such testing. Why does God allow this? There is a benefit both to our resilient character and to God to have a tested quality that proves the type of person we are. Yes, just as a parent praises a child that faced up to the challenge in an adult way, just so God commends and rewards us for standing firm for what is right.

Finally, there can be tests that no one in particular initiated. The Bible calls those “time and unforeseen circumstances.” They fall on people indiscriminately. These could be adverse weather, or earthquakes and other natural disasters that destroy homes and lives. The “test” in this case is how we react. Will we find fault with God--for him allowing this to happen? Maybe even blaming him for causing this to happen? Or will we see it as a challenge to remain in God’s love, realizing it is not him doing this? In fact, in some cases (as in the Job’s case) it is possible that it is Satan causing these “natural” disasters.

So, according to God’s Word, the Bible, the tests God puts on people are designed to show us how we can reciprocate his love and are very gentle and kind. The tests that those opposed to God put on us are designed to destroy our confidence and loyalty in God and are harsh and cruel. Finally, “time and unforeseen circumstances” should never be blamed on God. Our loyalty and unbreakable love under all such situations is what God is looking for in us.

Additional References:
Judges 3:1-6. Here, Jehovah God allows certain foreign nations that do not serve him to continue occupying some of the promise land. It was a test on the Israelites to see if with such an influence they would still remain loyal to instructions handed down through Moses and the other representatives of God (Joshua, the loyal kings, the prophets).

Psalms 26:1,2. This is a very interesting passage. Here, the writer actually asks God to test him because he wants to demonstrate how much he really loves God. In a much lesser sense, don’t we do the same with people we are trying to impress? Candidates vying for a job may ask, “Just try me out. See if I don’t prove myself worthwhile.”

God Did Not Make the Devil



I was reading a news article recently about a mother who tortured to death her own child. It was so disturbing, I could not finish the story. I won’t go into details here, however, the incident I was reading about was/is not unique. If you search the internet for “mother tortures child” you will find more than one case. Most “decent” humans would be completely appalled, if not sickened, at such a thought. The natural anger against such atrocities and the heart-rending compassion that we would have for the young victims demonstrates how we feel about outrageous cruelty.

Now, let me ask you. Do you think that we are more compassionate than God is? I don’t think so. And yet some preachers actually teach that God is just as sadistic as parents who torture their own children. Why do I claim that? Their interpretation of John 8:44 and 1 John 3:8. John, both in his gospel account and in his first letter, speaks of Satan’s “beginning”—that he was “a manslayer when he began” and that “he (Satan) has been sinning from the beginning.” Those preachers interpret that to mean that when Satan was created, God created him as an evil being. They claim that God put Satan on the earth to tempt us. In fact, some preachers go so far as to say that in reality, God and Satan are co-workers. That, dear readers, is an incredibly slanderous lie against God.

The only “test” that God is spoken of as putting on humans are tests of loyalty, not of physical, psychological, and emotional tortures. In fact, James makes it very clear that God does not try mankind with evil. If God were collaborating with the Devil, even under many governments today, that would make him co-conspirator. Never will that be, never can that be. In fact, the latter half of 1 John 3:8 indicates that Christ came to break up the works of the devil. If God were responsible for the devil’s acts, then Christ would have to break up God’s works as well—and that would make no sense at all.

So what reasonable conclusion should we reach when reading John’s words? Just as a criminal makes a start for himself (as a criminal) when he first breaks the law, in the same way Satan made a start of his criminal personality in the garden of Eden. It was at the very beginning of mankind’s existence that he became a manslayer because his words and actions resulted in condemnation to death of Adam and Eve—and by extension, to the whole human family. From the very beginning of our existence, Satan saw an opportunity, lied to Eve and has been lying ever since. But before that event, who was the one that became Satan? He was one of tens-of-thousands (if not millions) of other angels that God had made as perfect. This should not be difficult to understand. Our own first parents (Adam & Eve) were also created perfect and chose a selfish course over loyalty to God. The same with Satan.

In summary then, God made a good angel who acted on selfish desire and, in so doing, that angel made himself “Satan.” It is the same exact thing that happened with our first human parents—they were created “in God’s image” (good in every way), but they knowingly acted on a selfish desire.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Studying-Getting A Rich Spiritual Tan



Do not think of it as a drudgery, "Ah man, I've gotta study now." Instead think of it as getting a rich suntan of wisdom on the endless beach of Jehovah's vast knowledge.

As our skin absorbs the sun rays so likewise we need to absorb the rays of knowledge & wisdom not just through reading, but through reflecting (meditating, contemplating) on what we read. Although physical tans can be hurried through various means, acquiring a luxurious spiritual tan takes time because it takes years for our brain to start making inter-relational connections with the things we read. In time, things we are currently reading in the Bible, will start to call back to our minds things we've read in the past.

That is one reason that associating with like-minded believers is so helpful. Listening to them express their faith helps us make new connections in the way we think and reflect on scripture. Learning from other's experience accelerates the learning process BECAUSE what may have taken us years to conclude now can be learned much quicker from others that have done this longer. After more than 40 years of studying the Bible, I can still very humbly admit that many of the new thought-connections I make are because of hearing the perspective of fellow believers. Indeed, more than few of the articles I've written here were because of a comment I heard that I expanded on.

So if you admire the deep spiritual tan (knowledge and insight) that others have, know that you can have it too. All you need to do is study, reflect, and associate with fellow believers.