Recently an anonymous commenter wrote that the whole set
of my articles were nicely written “stories.” He (or maybe she) went on to
explain that just as in the movie “Life of Pi” (the commenter misspelled it “pie”),
it all depends on what the audience wants to believe. The commenter thus
implied that truth is whatever one chooses to believe. I’ve already written an
article addressing
the relativity of “truth,” so herein I wanted to address the accusation
that the Bible merely contains unprovable stories. One thing that separates
fact from fiction is that facts can be proven.
Archeology
has several times come to the defense of the Bible. People, places and events
have been corroborated. With this proof alone, reasoning people can easily see
that the Bible is more akin to a history book than it is a child’s fable.
Scientists have also come forward in favor of the Bible.
For instance consider this personal experience of a man whose study is neurophysiology.
Raised an atheist, it was his own studies that convinced him the Bible was more
than meets the eye. Also, here are two articles from biochemists, one a
man the other a
woman, who started out as atheist but changed by reason of their field of
study. Yet another article is about a designer
of robots that gained an appreciation that God truly exists.
The brochure “Was
Life Created” may be of interest to some of you.
Other real-life experiences from the sciences and medical fields:
Nuclear Physicist (Apr.2004 Awake article)
Orthopedic Surgeon (Aug.2013 Awake article)
Kidney researcher (Sept.2013 Awake article)
Other real-life experiences from the sciences and medical fields:
Nuclear Physicist (Apr.2004 Awake article)
Orthopedic Surgeon (Aug.2013 Awake article)
Kidney researcher (Sept.2013 Awake article)
No comments:
Post a Comment